ArticleBMC primary care2026
Geospatial analysis of primary healthcare accessibility and qualitative assessment of affordability in rural communities of Twifo Ati-Morkwaa District, Ghana.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regardless of the efforts of the government and the private sector to improve health facilities in Ghana, a significant number of rural communities still experience inadequate access to primary healthcare. This study used the mixed-methods approach to provide an overview of the geographic distribution of healthcare facilities and the accessibility and affordability of primary healthcare within the Twifo Ati-Morkwaa District. Accessibility was assessed using Euclidean buffer analysis around primary healthcare facilities, while affordability was examined qualitatively using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with community members, community leaders and health workers. Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted using the purposive sampling technique to select 97 respondents including community members, community leaders and healthcare personnel. Additionally, the Geographic Information System (GIS) software, specifically ArcGIS Pro, was used to analyze the spatial distribution of health facilities. The findings reveal that approximately 95% of sampled communities were located within 5 km of a primary healthcare facility based on straight-line distance; however, qualitative findings indicated that transport costs, poor road conditions, and physical barriers substantially constrained effective access. Furthermore, primary healthcare was found not to be affordable due to the high cost of transportation because of the poor nature of roads. Recommendations include government investment in road infrastructure to reduce transportation costs, thereby improving the affordability of primary healthcare and facilitating access to services. These findings bear important implications for achieving the health-related Sustainable Development Goals set forth by the United Nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.