ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Early prediction of renal replacement therapy within 24 hours after septic shock recognition in the emergency department using machine learning: a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multicenter registry.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of patients with septic shock who may soon require renal replacement therapy (RRT) is clinically important but challenging in the emergency department (ED), where definitive indications for RRT often have not yet developed at the time of presentation. Recognizing these patients in advance is important for timely planning of RRT initiation, including coordination of equipment and personnel at the hospital level. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models that predict the need for RRT within 24 h of septic shock recognition in the ED.
methodsWe analyzed data from the Korean Shock Society septic shock registry collected from October 2015 to December 2023. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and five ML models were trained. The best-performing model was selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Shapley additive explanations were used to interpret the contribution of each feature.
resultsIn total, 5361 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 728 (13.6%) required RRT within 24 h. Among the evaluated models, categorical boosting (CatBoost) demonstrated the best discrimination with an AUROC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.833–0.887), outperforming conventional severity scores such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (AUROC, 0.673 [95% CI, 0.628–0.717]) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (AUROC, 0.672 [95% CI, 0.623–0.719]).
conclusionsThe CatBoost model demonstrated moderate discriminative performance for predicting early RRT requirement within 24 h of ED septic shock recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.