ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
How are handover delays from ambulances to emergency departments being addressed in the United Kingdom? A nationwide survey of ambulance services and emergency departments.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExcessive waiting times and ambulance handover delays are of high concern to healthcare professionals and the public internationally. Ambulance services and emergency departments (EDs) have attempted to mitigate delays but the initiatives implemented have not been systematically described. To inform site selection for a national evaluation of such initiatives (the STALLED study), we set out to identify and describe initiatives that have been implemented at the ED entrance to address delayed ambulance handover in the United Kingdom (UK).
methodsSurvey of current practice in all UK ambulance services (a total of 13) using a semi-structured questionnaire, distributed by email, focusing on initiatives based at the door of emergency departments, for completion and return by email or telephone interview. We also sent the questionnaire to a purposive sample of 24 EDs, identified from ambulance service responses. We summarised and coded initiatives reported and mapped them to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, to support an understanding of where and how those initiatives influenced the healthcare system.
resultsTwelve of 13 ambulance services and 16 of 24 EDs responded to the questionnaire describing 34 and 36 initiatives respectively. All respondents reported having several (between two and 12 per service) initiatives in place to reduce handover delays, most commonly involving ambulance staff caring for groups of patients in ED corridors (8/12), coordinated patient handovers within a defined time period (7/12), and ED reconfiguration to facilitate rapid offload (10/16). Most initiatives focussed on changes which influenced the organisation of care, the introduction or revision of key tasks and roles for staff, as well as changes to the ED environment.
conclusionsAmbulance services and EDs have implemented a variety of initiatives to reduce handover delays. Most of the initiatives involve multiple parts of the system, including tasks, staff, the organisation and the internal environment. These complex initiatives require careful study to understand how they work and how they can inform best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.