ArticleCommunications biology2026
Accurate protein-protein interactions modeling through physics-informed geometric invariant learning.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AlphaFold has set a new standard for predicting protein structures from primary sequences; however, it faces challenges with protein complexes across species, engineered proteins, and antigen-antibody interactions, where co-evolutionary signals may be sparse or missing. Herein, we present ProTact, a SE(3)-invariant geometric graph neural network that integrates physics-informed geometric complementarity and trigonometric constraints as inductive biases to enhance protein-protein contact predictions. ProTact is applicable to both experimental and predicted monomer structures and utilizes a modulated key point matching algorithm to approximate accurate docking poses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that ProTact consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based methods on benchmark datasets, achieving notable relative improvements of 31.63% in average top-10 precision (Precision@10) for CASP 13 and 14 targets and 31.94% for DIPS-Plus datasets on high-quality structures. While performance naturally declines on the more challenging unbound complexes due to large conformational changes, ProTact maintains a competitive edge over baselines. Moreover, when combined with AlphaFold3 as re-scoring functions, ProTact surpasses its default confidence scores, offering over 30.48% improvements in low-MSA contexts. We anticipate that the proposed framework will advance our understanding of protein interactions, functions, and design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.