ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance evaluation of superplasticizers in one part geopolymer mortar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of one-part geopolymer cement (OPGC) is constrained by its intrinsically low workability, which limits handling, casting, and field implementation. This study introduces a dry-mix technological strategy in which powdered superplasticizers (SPs) are directly pre-blended with the geopolymer binder, thereby eliminating on-site liquid admixture dosing and enhancing practical constructability. Powdered sulfonated naphthalene formaldehyde (SNF) and polycarboxylate ether (PCE) were incorporated at 0.5-2.5% by binder weight into an OPGC mortar composed of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), diatomite, and feldspar, activated using solid sodium hydroxide and anhydrous sodium silicate. Fresh performance, mechanical behavior, and in-situ quality indicators were evaluated through flowability, setting time, compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and rebound hammer testing. Chemical stability and microstructural evolution were examined via zeta potential, ATR-FTIR, XRD, SEM, and EDS analyses. The incorporation of 1% SNF yielded a 272.9% increase in relative slump and a 15.44% enhancement in 28-day compressive strength compared with the control, achieving a peak strength of 53.8 MPa. In contrast, PCE produced marginal workability gains (< 15%) and caused substantial strength reductions (up to 47%) to higher dosages. Spectroscopic and zeta potential analyses confirmed the chemical robustness of SNF under highly alkaline conditions, whereas PCE exhibited structural degradation and adverse dispersion behavior. Microstructural observations revealed denser and more homogeneous geopolymer gel matrix in SNF-modified systems. All SNF-based mortars exceeded 43 MPa at 28 days, matching the performance benchmark of 43-grade Ordinary Portland Cement while delivering an estimated 16-25% cost reduction. These findings demonstrate that the dry incorporation of SNF provides a scalable and industry-compatible pathway for producing high-performance, user-friendly one-part geopolymer binders, advancing their viability for practical construction applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.