ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and temporal validation of five year retinal arteriosclerosis risk prediction in high risk adults from an East China cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural variations in retinal vessels predict clinical conditions related to vascular health. This study aims to describe the incidence and distribution of retinal arteriosclerosis and to develop risk prediction models for high-risk populations. Data were obtained from a retrospective health examination cohort at Hua Dong Sanatorium, China. The primary outcome was retinal arteriosclerosis. Candidate risk predictors were selected based on biological plausibility and potential predictive ability. Risk prediction models were developed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predictive performance was evaluated through discrimination and calibration accuracy.Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (100 iterations) to estimate optimism and to report optimism-corrected discrimination (C-index) and calibration (slope). In the derivation cohort, 10,323 individuals were diagnosed with retinal arteriosclerosis over 288,525 person-years (incidence density: 35.8 per 1,000 person-years). Males over 40 and females over 45 were identified as relatively high-risk groups. Risk predictors included age, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, high-density lipoprotein, and serum creatinine. The C-index of the risk prediction models was approximately 0.8 in the validation set. These models are accessible to potential users via an online application. The risk prediction models may facilitate early intervention by modifying risk factors, thereby reducing the incidence of retinal arteriosclerosis in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.