ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Effect of oliceridine on hypoxia during sedated hysteroscopy: a Phase 4 randomized clinical trial.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypoxia is a common complication in hysteroscopic surgery under sedation with conventional opioids. Oliceridine, a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, provides effective analgesia with fewer opioid-related adverse events, but its impact on intraoperative hypoxia in hysteroscopy remains unclear.
methodsThis is a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (TRN: ChiCTR2400090351), patients scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery under sedation were enrolled. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive sufentanil (0.15 μg·kg⁻¹) or oliceridine (40 μg·kg⁻¹), combined with propofol (1.5 mg·kg⁻¹). The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative hypoxia from sedative drug initiation to hysteroscopy completion. Secondary outcomes included subclinical respiratory depression, severe hypoxia, airway interventions, supplemental propofol requirements, pain scores, arterial blood gas analysis, and patient and surgeon satisfaction.
resultsAmong 492 randomized patients, 482 (98%) completed the trial. The incidence of intraoperative hypoxia is significantly lower in the oliceridine group (24 [9.8%] of 246 patients) than that in the sufentanil group (48 [19.5%] of 246 patients; RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.32-0.79]; P = 0.002). The lowest oxygen saturation is higher in the oliceridine group (99.0 [94.0, 100.0] vs 97.0 [90.0, 100.0], P < 0.001). Compared to sufentanil group, oliceridine group requires less propofol intraoperatively (median difference: 10.0 mg, 95% CI: 0.0 to 14.5; P = 0.03), has lower PaCO
conclusionsOliceridine reduces the incidence of intraoperative hypoxia during hysteroscopic surgery under sedation, suggesting it may be a safer alternative to sufentanil.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.