Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896480›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026

Lab Scale Closed-Loop Recycling of Polycarbonate Bioreactors for Sustainable Process Development.

Magali Barbaroux, Eric Sorge, Pierre Moulinié, Jannik Dippel, Janice Zitoun, Roberta Chiara Tosato, Alessandro Vanni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magali BarbarouxSartorius Stedim FMT S.A.S., (Corporate Research) ZI Des Paluds, Avenue de Jouques, 13400, Aubagne, France. magali.barbaroux@sartorius.com.
Eric SorgeMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Pierre MouliniéCovestro LLC, 1 Covestro Circle, Pittsburgh, PA, 15205, USA.
Jannik DippelSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Janice ZitounSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Roberta Chiara TosatoSartorius Stedim Italy S.R.L. , Via A. Meucci N.4, 50012, Grassina, Bagno a Ripoli, Italy.
Alessandro VanniThe Automation Partnership (Cambridge) Limited, Part of the Sartorius Stedim Biotech Group York Way, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 5WY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite well-known benefits, the increasing use of single-use technology (SUT) in biopharmaceutical processes has raised concerns about the environmental impact of plastic waste. This paper provides the first bioprocessing industry example of a "closing the loop" proof of concept by implementing a circular economy model for a polycarbonate (PC) bioreactor vessel used in process development applications. Through a collaborative effort between an end user, a SUT supplier, and a resin supplier, a lab-scale study was initiated to collect, decontaminate, and mechanically recycle material from vessels after use in mammalian cell culture experiments to produce new vessels. The study demonstrates that using recycled PC reduces vessels' environmental footprint and does not adversely impact vessel extractables. Even in direct contact with cells and media, recycled PC left cell culture performance and monoclonal antibody production largely unaffected. This work paves the way for broader adoption of circular practices in the industry. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate closed-loop recycling of PC across multiple environmental indicators (e.g., climate change, resource use, water use, etc.). Benefits typically favor the closed-loop system, but sensitivity analysis indicates that variations in parameters such as recovery yield, contamination rate, means of transport, and electricity mix can erode these advantages in non-ideal settings. The paper outlines the logistics, challenges, and learnings from this program, emphasizing the need for standardized procedures and collaboration across teams to achieve sustainable SUT circularity. KEY POINTS: • Recycling bioreactor polycarbonate vessels reduces environmental footprint. • Equivalent extractables observed in virgin and recycled polycarbonate vessels. • Cell culture performance is comparable across recycled and virgin vessels.

Indexed as

BioreactorsPolycarboxylate CementRecyclingAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCell Culture TechniquesPolycarbonatesAntibodies, MonoclonalpolycarbonatePolycarbonatesPolycarboxylate CementBioreactorCell-cultureCircular-economyLife-cycle-assessmentPlasticPolycarbonateRecycling

Identifiers

PMID41896480
PMCPMC13032987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.