ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
PBPK Modelling of PROTACs: Learnings from ARV-110 as a Case Example.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study presents a comprehensive evaluation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling for Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs), using ARV-110 (Bavdegalutamide) as a case example. We sought to develop a PBPK model that accurately predicts the human pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARV-110 and began with a bottom-up approach to predict ARV-110 PK in mice and rats using available ADME and physicochemical data. Owing to the observed in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) gaps in clearance, the published in vivo data was used for refinement, resulting in a middle-out PBPK model bridging this discrepancy. PBPK predictions were extrapolated to human and validated against observed clinical PK for single and multiple doses in healthy volunteers and cancer patients revealing IVIVE gaps for human clearance. Similar to rodents, a middle-out modeling approach was then used to refine the human PBPK prediction. This model effectively captured plasma drug concentration-time profiles reported for preclinical and clinical studies, including studies involving impact of food and drug-drug interactions with itraconazole and esomeprazole. All observed human concentrations were within 5th and 95th percentile of predictions and PK parameters were within two-fold of the observed in vivo data. Following administration of a single dose (280 mg) of ARV-110, the observed vs. predicted AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
41896448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.