ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Socioeconomic status and migration background as predictors of complicated lower respiratory tract infections in primary care.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic status and migration background as predictors of complicated lower respiratory tract infections in primary care.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on risk factors for a complicated course of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary care remains limited and often consensus based. While socioeconomic status (SES) and migration background have been linked to complicated LRTIs in population-based studies, their predictive value in primary care remains unclear. Consequently, these factors are not incorporated within current guidelines, which may contribute to health inequalities. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the added value of SES and migration background as predictive factors of a complicated course of LRTIs in primary care.
methodsRoutine care data from Dutch general practices participating in the Extramural LUMC Academic Network database (Leiden-The Hague-Zoetermeer region) from 2014 to 2023, excluding COVID-19 years, was linked to sociodemographic and hospital claims data from Statistic Netherlands. Adults presenting with LRTI complaints were included (n = 145,445). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to predict 30-day hospitalisation or death following LRTI. Models included conventional risk factors with SES and migration background subsequently added.
resultsIn this study we show that after adjusting for conventional clinical factors, SES is a strong predictor of a complicated course of LRTI, whereas migration background is not. Patients in the lowest SES category have an adjusted odds ratio of 1.46 (95%CI: 1.31 - 1.62) for a complicated course compared to the highest.
conclusionsSES is a strong predictor of a complicated course of LRTI in primary care, even after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The incorporation of SES into clinical decision tools and guidelines has the potential to enhance risk-stratification of patients with LRTI in daily practice of primary care, thereby supporting more equitable care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.