Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896375›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A clinical machine learning model for 1-year functional outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke: temporal validation across evolving guidelines.

Peijia Liu, Ying Cao, Xingbang Zou, Zhaobo Zhang, Jinan Fang, Peipei Liu, Peifang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peijia LiuDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China.
Ying CaoDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China.
Xingbang ZouDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China.
Zhaobo ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China.
Jinan FangDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China.
Peipei LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Xinhua University, Hefei, 230088, China. liupeipei@axhu.edu.cn.
Peifang LiuDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150088, China. liupeifang@hrbmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Joint Fund Cultivation Project of Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China PL2024H099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of 1-year excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is vital for guiding long-term rehabilitation. However, existing tools primarily focus on short-term (3-month) outcomes and often lack validation in temporally distinct cohorts, particularly when clinical guidelines and treatment landscapes evolve. To address this, we trained six machine learning models on a derivation cohort (n = 965, admitted 2020–2023) managed under the 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. The optimal logistic regression (LR) model included eight key predictors: admission NIHSS, admission mRS, age, neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio (NLR), glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), D‑dimer, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). The LR model was rigorously assessed on an independent temporal validation cohort (n = 144, admitted 2024) treated under the 2023 Guidelines, which expanded indications for reperfusion therapy. Although the validation cohort showed significantly higher thrombolysis rates and milder symptoms than the derivation cohort, the LR model demonstrated robust performance (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.87), significantly outperforming admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64–0.81). The model also showed substantial incremental value with a net reclassification improvement of 0.71 and an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.14 (both P < 0.001). Finally, an open‑access web‑based predictor was deployed to facilitate clinical implementation within the first 24 h of admission. In summary, we developed and temporally validated a robust, interpretable prediction model for 1-year functional outcome in AIS, offering a practical tool for long-term prognosis.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeMachine LearningAgedBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeAcute ischemic strokeFunctional recoveryLong-term outcomeMachine learningTemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID41896375
PMCPMC13039326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.