Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896374›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Experimental study on portable multi-parameter intelligent wind measurement sensor.

Zhensuo Wang, Yueqing Wang, Yaozu Ni, Xianhui Gong, Kai Jing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhensuo WangCollege of Mining Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China. hkjwangzhensuo@163.com.
Yueqing WangCollege of Mining Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China.
Yaozu NiCollege of Safety Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China.
Xianhui GongCollege of Mining Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China.
Kai JingCollege of Mining Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China.

Funding

The Scientific and technological key project ofBasic Research and Academic Work Fund Project of Provincial Higher Education Institutions of Heilongjiang Province 2024-KYYWF-1106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the inability of traditional mechanical anemometers to satisfy the demand for high accuracy, real-time measurement, and dynamic monitoring of ventilation parameters in intelligent deep mining environments, this study focuses on the accuracy verification and analysis of a portable multi-parameter intelligent wind measurement sensor. Comparative analyses of direct-through and reflective ultrasonic measurement principles and their respective error characteristics were conducted, indicating the reflective structure’s superior accuracy. Experiments were carried out in a low-speed circular wind tunnel to investigate the impact of measurement angle deviations on instrument accuracy, resulting in the identification of an optimal measurement angle. Additionally, studies on average airflow velocity measurements were performed, leading to the generation of airflow velocity contour distributions. An average airflow velocity prediction model was developed and subsequently validated through field testing, demonstrating measurement errors within ± 0.1 m/s. This research provides both theoretical foundations and technical support for enhancing intelligent ventilation management in deep coal mining operations.

Indexed as

Average wind speedIntelligent wind measurementPortableUltrasonic anemometerWind tunnel experiment

Identifiers

PMID41896374
PMCPMC13039357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.