ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Cortical morphometry might predict currently prescribed vs. discontinued medications in bipolar disorder, even after controlling for the cumulative dose effects: An ENIGMA mega-analysis.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
67 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent research suggests that brain anatomy may help identify the most effective pharmacological treatment for each individual with bipolar disorder and reduce trial-and-error prescribing. We aimed to investigate whether brain anatomy predicts whether a medication is currently prescribed or has been discontinued, as a proxy for treatment effectiveness. The rationale is that medications that provide clinical benefit without unacceptable side effects are likely to be continued, whereas those with limited benefit or poor tolerability are typically discontinued. We used T1-weighted MRI from twelve ENIGMA-BD cohorts (n = 2462; 473 individuals with BD [61% female, age 18-73] and 1989 controls) to derive regional cortical thickness and surface area and subcortical volumes. Site differences were harmonized using ComBat models fitted on controls' data. Within cross-validation, models were trained to first adjust for cumulative dose and other covariates and then predict medication status. On test sets, current prescription (vs. discontinuation) of lithium was predicted by greater cortical thickness and reduced surface area, whereas current prescription (vs. discontinuation) of antidepressants and atypical antipsychotics was predicted by greater cortical thickness. Predictive regions for atypical antipsychotics were generally consistent across subgroups of age, gender, illness duration, and history of psychosis, and in the largest site, and differed from those associated with cumulative effects of medication on the cortex. Predictions were poor for subcortical volumes and for antiepileptic mood stabilizers and typical antipsychotics. These findings provide preliminary support that cortical anatomy may help inform future development of biomarkers for treatment selection, pending validation in longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41896364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.