ArticleScientific reports2026
Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in promoting wound healing and shoulder function recovery after shoulder surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study examined whether Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) use was associated with improved wound healing and functional recovery after shoulder surgery. We analyzed records from Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (January 2018-December 2023) and included 170 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (n = 100), shoulder replacement (n = 40), or subacromial decompression (n = 30). Within each surgery type, patients receiving PRP (treatment group [TG]) were matched 1:1 to patients not receiving PRP (control group [CG]) using propensity scores derived from age, sex, comorbidities, and baseline pain. Outcomes included wound healing time, postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), shoulder function (Constant-Murley score), complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. In matched analyses, PRP use was associated with shorter wound healing time and improved postoperative pain and functional outcomes across procedures, with the largest and most robust differences observed in the rotator cuff repair cohort. PRP was also associated with a shorter hospitalization duration in all three surgery cohorts. Complication rates were lower in the rotator cuff repair cohort, while no clear between-group differences were observed in the shoulder replacement or subacromial decompression cohorts. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the PRP groups. Given the retrospective design, potential residual confounding, and smaller sample sizes in non-rotator cuff cohorts, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant confirmation in prospective, surgery-specific studies using standardized PRP protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.