ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid evaluation model for intelligent manufacturing under uncertainties by integrating human-machine systems and automation strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accelerated development of intelligent manufacturing places a high demand on the ability to evaluate the processes that can manage the uncertainty in human-machine integration and choice of automation strategy. This paper presents a new model of assessment where Circular Spherical Fuzzy Sets (CSFS), Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA), and the CRITIC weighting technique are combined to analyze intelligent manufacturing system in case of uncertainty. With the flexibility of CSFS and objective contrast analysis of CRITIC and the ideal-real comparison of MAIRCA transparent, the model combines ambiguity, hesitation and conflict of one criterion to another and balances subjective judgments and objective weighting. Compared with conventional techniques like AHP and TOPSIS, the suggested one overcomes the rank instability and has a greater strength in the unpredictable environment, which is why it is very appropriate to Industry 5.0-oriented decision-making. The model has been shown to be applicable, robust and easy to make decisions as illustrated in a hypothetical smart manufacturing case study that emphasizes the usefulness of the model in practice by practitioners who have been interested in finding the reliability of the human-automation configuration in next-generation manufacturing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.