ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Evaluating headwater hydrology: Tracer dye studies reveal prolonged residence times and potential modeling limitations during severe low-flow periods.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While models are commonly used to predict the fate and transport of agricultural chemicals in the environment, they often struggle to accurately estimate key stream characteristics, such as discharge and residence time, in headwater systems. To improve our understanding of these systems and assess model performance, tracer studies were conducted under diverse flow conditions in two headwater watersheds in the Midwestern United States. These studies revealed exceptionally long residence times (4-10 days) during low-flow conditions, explaining prolonged pesticide concentrations in the study system. Furthermore, residence times were found to decrease exponentially with small increases in stream discharge. Comparisons with model predictions (NHDPlus and PRZM-SWAT) highlighted significant limitations, particularly during low-flow conditions, where models underpredicted residence time by up to nine days. These results suggest that under extreme conditions (e.g., low flow), traditional models may underestimate exposure and persistence in headwater watersheds, potentially affecting risk assessment. Ultimately, these findings underscore the value of incorporating tracer study insights into future model assumptions to more accurately characterize potential agricultural chemical exposure in headwater systems under extreme conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.