ArticleScientific reports2026
Forensic examination to determine the correlation between fingerprint patterns and blood groups in the population of Assam.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fingerprints are a widely used biometric marker in both civil identification and forensic investigations. This study aimed to examine variations in fingerprint patterns and their association with ABO blood groups in a north-eastern Indian population. A cross-sectional design was employed, including a relatively large sample of 1,040 volunteers aged 18-28 years, which is uncommon in comparable dermatoglyphic studies. Blood groups were determined using ABO monoclonal kits, and fingerprints were collected using an ink-based fingerprint pad and roller, followed by analysis with handheld optical magnification. Statistical analysis using the Chi-square test demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between fingerprint patterns and blood groups (p = 0.030), indicating a non-random association at the level of fingerprint observations. Although the findings should be interpreted with appropriate caution regarding inferential strength, the observed correlation may support preliminary forensic screening, particularly in scenarios involving compromised DNA samples or resource-limited settings. The study contributes robust, population-specific dermatoglyphic data to the existing literature. However, the results should not be interpreted as deterministic or predictive at the individual level, and further studies employing participant-level analytical approaches are recommended to strengthen the evidentiary basis of these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.