ArticleScientific reports2026
Utilizing Defatted Hulless Pumpkin Seed Meal for Bread Fortification: A Valorization Approach to Improve Techno-functional and Textural properties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of substitution of hulless defatted pumpkin seed powder (HDPSP) on dough and bread properties. Doughs and bread with 0–10% HDPSP were prepared in order to evaluate their physicochemical and sensory characteristics. Farinograph analysis evaluated flour’s mixing capabilities of different HDPSP substituted doughs, while bread quality was assessed for physical and bioactive properties. HDPSP substituted breads showed enhanced antioxidant capacity (2.00 to 8.94% RSA), total phenols (100.67 to 121.21 mg GAE/100 g) and total flavonoid content (19.98 to 28.02 mg QE/100 g). A significant (p ≤ 0.05) lighter bread crust and darker crumb (lower L*) with increased redness level (a*) in crust was observed with a decline in crumb on increasing the levels of HDPSP in breads. The breads with 5% HDPSP substitution was chosen as best with overall acceptability score of 8.45 followed by control bread (8.37). However, the hardness increased from 7.83 N to 8.55 N with 5% substitution of HDPSP in bread while the gumminess was observed as 79.94 N and 157.33 N in control and 5% HDPSP substituted bread. The gumminess and hardness could have counterbalanced each, exhibiting better consumer texture perception. All the data were subjected to a multivariate analysis (PCA) for understanding relationships between different variables. The first principal component (PC1), accounts for 87.1% of the variance indicating effective separation of samples based on their overall performance and quality while second principal component (PC2) offered little additional separation with variance of 10.4%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.