ArticleScientific reports2026
PCB-YOLOV8X: a network for detecting micro-sized defects on PCB surfaces based on enhanced feature information.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges in PCB surface defect detection, including high labor costs, low detection efficiency, and insufficient detection accuracy, this study innovatively proposes a PCB surface micro-defect detection network called PCB-YOLOV8X based on the YOLOv8 model. By integrating the C2f-DCNV2 adaptive feature extraction module and the SPPF-LSKA efficient feature enhancement module, the network significantly improves the detection accuracy and efficiency for micro-sized defects. Furthermore, an optimized IWD-CIoU loss function is proposed to more precisely evaluate the matching degree between predicted and ground truth bounding boxes. In comparative experiments with different models, PCB-YOLOV8X achieves optimal performance on key metrics, including mAP@0.5 of 98.44%, Precision of 97.67%, and Recall of 96.34%. Compared with the traditional YOLOv8 model, these represent improvements of 2.76% in mAP@0.5, 2.33% in Precision, and 2.59% in Recall. The proposed PCB-YOLOv8X demonstrates enhanced capability in feature extraction and fusion in PCB surface micro-defect detection tasks, effectively solving issues such as low accuracy, missed detections, and false alarms in existing PCB defect detection models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.