ArticleScientific reports2026
Serological detection and epidemiological analysis of HBV among butchers in Khartoum State.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to detect the presence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) among butchers in Khartoum State, Sudan, using serological methods. The objectives include determining the frequency of HBV infection, identifying associated risk factors, exploring the association between positive HBV results and previous jaundice, and comparing the infection rates between vaccinated and non-vaccinated butchers. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2022 to March 2023, encompassing 385 butchers from various localities in Khartoum State. Data were collected through structured interviews and blood samples, which were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The study revealed that 3.1% (12/385) of the butchers tested positive for HBsAg. No significant associations were found between HBsAg positivity and factors such as age, marital status, educational level, previous occupation, knife-sharing, or surgical history. However, a significant association was identified between HBsAg positivity and years of butchery experience, with newer butchers (< 1 year) showing higher infection rates (p = 0.005). Notably, all HBsAg-positive individuals were unvaccinated. The study highlights a significant prevalence of HBV among butchers in Khartoum State, underscoring the need for enhanced public health interventions. The absence of vaccination in all HBsAg-positive cases highlights critical gaps in preventive measures. Recommendations include targeted education and training programs, increased vaccination coverage, and regular health screenings to mitigate the risk of HBV infection in this high-risk occupational group. These interventions are essential to reduce HBV transmission and improve occupational health standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.