Articlenpj biodiversity2026
Oceanographic connectivity strongly restricts future range expansions of critical marine forest species.
Article in npj biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling of the geographical distribution of two forest-forming fucoids in the Strait-Alboran demarcation (southern Iberian Peninsula): Implications for conservation and restoration.Journal of phycology · 2026Article
- Will the Mediterranean Sea Be a Cul-de-Sac for Marine Gastropods Under Climate Change?Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Global Cold-Water Coral Biodiversity Redistribution Under Projected Climate Change.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Assessing climatic conditions and biotic interactions shaping the success of Cystoseira foeniculacea early-life stages.Journal of phycology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is driving a global redistribution of marine biodiversity. As habitats shift, oceanographic connectivity (the transport of dispersive stages via ocean currents) becomes a critical, yet poorly understood, factor that can either facilitate or hinder species' expansions into new areas. To quantify this influence, we developed a framework linking species distribution models with biophysical connectivity models to examine the redistribution of 467 marine forest species (seagrasses and brown macroalgae) under end-of-century climate change scenarios. Our projections show substantial habitat loss for both groups, reaching up to 50% (seagrasses) and 58% (brown macroalgae) of current habitats under higher emissions. Despite potential poleward expansions, oceanographic connectivity emerges as a major limiting factor. Accounting for average dispersal duration, range expansions are reduced by up to 38% in area (seagrasses) and 48% (macroalgae), and by up to 64% and 72% in distance, respectively. This reduction significantly increases the percentage of species facing a net loss of suitable habitat. Notably, well-defined dispersal barriers restrict expansions into highly suitable regions (e.g., the Okhotsk Sea, New Zealand, and the Arctic). Our findings underscore the need to explicitly integrate both habitat suitability and oceanographic connectivity to accurately predict marine biodiversity redistribution and inform effective conservation strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.