Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Keeping up with the regions: a hybrid machine learning framework for estimating regional input-output tables.

Francesco De Pretis, Daniele Tortoli, Sara Caria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco De PretisFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33110, Tampere, Finland. francesco.depretis@tuni.fi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8395-7833
Daniele TortoliDepartment of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-7049
Sara CariaDepartment of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6350-9192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate regional input-output (IO) tables are indispensable for economic analysis and policy-making, yet their availability remains limited due to data constraints. This paper develops a novel hybrid framework combining Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) with residual boosting to estimate regional IO tables, and compares it to improved RAS methods. To our knowledge, this is the first approach to embed hard marginal constraints via an IPF layer inside the GAN generator, combined with residual boosting to correct systematic errors. Our approach integrates deep learning with matrix balancing, maintaining economic interpretability while significantly improving statistical performance. Through validation on real-world data from the National Input-Output Tables (NIOT) and World Input-Output Tables (WIOT), we demonstrate that our GAN+Boost framework substantially outperforms the improved RAS technique, achieving [Formula: see text] improvements of 8.9 and 1.2 percentage points on NIOT and WIOT respectively. Structural metrics show even larger gains: diagonal correlation improves by 160% on NIOT, while Gini-based inequality metrics demonstrate 73-82% better preservation of distributional structure across both datasets. The framework enables more reliable regional economic analysis while reducing data collection costs, with potential applications in regional development planning and economic impact assessment.

Indexed as

Generative adversarial networksImproved RASMachine learningRegional economicsRegional input-output analysisResidual boosting

Identifiers

PMID41896286
PMCPMC13039687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.