ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Hypergraph representations of single-cell RNA sequencing data for improved cell clustering.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rates of Evolution Differ Between Cell Types Identified by Single-Cell RNAseq in Threespine Stickleback.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- HNPP: Higher-order network-based personalized PageRank for detecting critical phase in complex biological systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis is often performed using network projections that produce co-expression networks. These network-based algorithms are attractive because regulatory interactions are fundamentally network-based and there are many tools available for downstream analysis. However, most network-based approaches have two major limitations. First, they are typically unipartite and therefore fail to capture higher-order information. Second, scRNA-seq data are often sparse, so most algorithms for constructing unipartite network projections are inefficient and may overestimate co-expression relationships, or may under-utilize the sparsity when clustering (e.g. with cosine distance). To address these limitations, we propose representing scRNA-seq expression data as hypergraphs, which are generalized graphs where a hyperedge can connect more than two nodes. In this context, hypergraph nodes represent cells, and hyperedges represent genes. Each hyperedge connects all cells in which its corresponding gene is actively expressed, indicating the expression of that gene across different cells. The resulting hypergraph can capture higher-order information and appropriately handle varying levels of data sparsity. This representation enables clustering algorithms to leverage higher-order relationships for improved cell-type differentiation.
resultsTo distinguish cell types using hypergraph representations of scRNA-seq data, we introduce two novel clustering algorithms: (i) Dual-Importance Preference Hypergraph Walk (DIPHW) and (ii) Co-expression and Memory-Integrated Dual-Importance Preference Hypergraph Walk (CoMem-DIPHW). DIPHW is a new hypergraph-based random walk algorithm that computes cell embeddings by considering the relative importance of genes to cells and cells to genes, incorporating a preference exponent to facilitate clustering. CoMem-DIPHW integrates two unipartite projections, the gene co-expression and cell co-expression networks, along with the cell-gene expression hypergraph derived from single-cell abundance count data into the random walk model. The advantage of CoMem-DIPHW is that it accounts for both local information from single-cell gene expression and global information from pairwise similarity in the two co-expression networks. We benchmark the performance of our algorithms against established and state-of-the-art deep learning approaches using both real-world and simulated scRNA-seq data. Real-world datasets include cells from the human pancreas, mouse pancreas, human brain, and mouse brain tissues. We also use a ground-truth labeled cell-type annotation dataset based on human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Quantitative evaluation shows that CoMem-DIPHW consistently outperforms established algorithms and state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for cell-type clustering. Our proposed algorithms show the greatest improvement on scRNA-seq data with weak modularity. Moreover, CoMem-DIPHW successfully annotates clusters with biologically relevant cell types. Our results highlight the utility of hypergraph representations in the analysis of scRNA-seq data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our methods are implemented in Python and available on GitHub (https://github.com/wanhe13/CoMem-DIPHW) and archived at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18927437).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.