ArticleBMJ open2026
Understanding the impact of genomic secondary findings on clinical care and patient experience: a protocol for a prospective observational study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGenomic testing allows for the identification of disease-causing genetic variants and may also reveal secondary findings (SF) unrelated to the reason for testing. As the list of medically actionable genes continues to grow, it is important to understand the impact of these findings on clinical care and patient experience, particularly in paediatric settings. This work will generate novel evidence on the clinical, patient, family and system impacts of medically actionable SF generated from genomic testing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods, prospective, observational study will describe the impacts of SF on clinical care and the patient and family experience. Participants include probands and/or parents of probands who receive SF (ie, cases), clinicians involved in managing their care and controls matched 2:1 to cases based on age group, phenotype and primary genomic testing result. We aim to enrol 50 cases and 100 controls among those who receive genomic testing through Genome-wide Sequencing Ontario or other local sequencing initiatives in Ontario, Canada. Clinicians involved in follow-up care will complete questionnaires related to risk assessment, medical recommendations and clinical utility of SF post-result disclosure and one year later. Patient questionnaires will record health service use and psychological outcomes (ie, personal utility, empowerment) every 6 months for 2 years. These data will be compared between cases and controls using parametric tests. Cases will be invited to a qualitative interview to learn about their experiences. Data will be analysed using quantitative and qualitative techniques, triangulating datasets to enhance the validity and depth of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO) Research Ethics Review System (REB# CTO 3655). We plan to present our results to academic, patient, clinician and decision-maker audiences through articles and presentations at provincial, national and international meetings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.