Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41895731›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026

Novel two-stage deep learning framework for automated pressure injury classification.

Ting-Yu Lai, Yi-Jiun Chou, Chun-You Liu, Chien-Wei Chen, Ching-Ting Lin, Wei-Chun Wang, Yimin Hsu, Ming-Li Hsieh, Shih-Sheng Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ting-Yu Lai *Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3561-0211
Yi-Jiun Chou *Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-2566
Chun-You Liu *Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0611-9143
Chien-Wei ChenArtificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3429-0062
Ching-Ting LinArtificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-9999
Wei-Chun WangArtificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-8174
Yimin HsuDepartment of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3746
Ming-Li HsiehDepartment of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-0551
Shih-Sheng ChangArtificial Intelligence and Robotic Innovation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan 011996@tool.caaumed.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-4818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) framework for automatic pressure injury (PI) staging directly from raw clinical images, without requiring manual lesion localisation. By integrating a two-stage deep learning approach-combining object detection and image classification-the proposed system seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce subjectivity and support consistent staging in real-world clinical workflows.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using 1807 PI images from China Medical University Hospital collected between 2020 and 2024. Lesions were annotated by five senior nurses with consensus. YOLOv9 was used for lesion detection, and DenseNet161 for staging. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and mean average precision (mAP)@0.5.

resultsThe object detection model (YOLOv9) achieved an mAP@0.5 of 0.796. On the independent test set (n=365), the staging model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 0.775, sensitivity of 0.775, specificity of 0.955, precision of 0.779 and F1 score of 0.775. DISCUSSION: The proposed two-stage AI framework-using YOLOv9 for lesion localisation and DenseNet161 for staging-demonstrated performance comparable to or exceeding previously reported approaches, while offering improved clinical interpretability when applied to real-world clinical images. By separating detection and classification, the framework reduced background noise and improved the ability to distinguish visually similar PI stages. However, challenges remain in handling intra-wound heterogeneity, subtle early-stage boundaries and variability in image quality.

conclusionsThis two-stage AI system may assist clinical staff by providing standardised, reproducible PI staging from clinical images, with potential for integration into nursing workflows.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPressure UlcerArtificial IntelligenceChinaClassification AlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsHumansIntelligent SystemsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDeep LearningNursing

Identifiers

PMID41895731
PMCPMC13034204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.