ReviewEuropean heart journal2026
Tricuspid regurgitation: standardized stepwise work-up from referral to expert heart valve centre.
Review in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The value of preoperative risk scores prior to tricuspid valve interventions: The TRI-SCORE and beyond.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common yet historically neglected condition associated with poor outcomes. Traditionally managed conservatively, TR has recently gained renewed attention, thanks to advances in surgical and transcatheter interventions. Selecting the optimal therapy, however, requires an integrated and systematic approach considering TR aetiology, stage of the disease, comorbidities, operative risk, and anatomical feasibility. This review describes a standardized stepwise work-up for patients with TR from the referral centre to the expert heart valve centre (HVC). It provides practical algorithms and structured protocols covering clinical and biological assessment, multimodality imaging (echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance), and invasive haemodynamic evaluation. The document highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, involving imagers, heart failure specialists, interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and surgeons, in line with the new recommendations of the 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease. By harmonizing diagnostic standards and promoting a structured approach to patient assessment within HVCs, this review aims to facilitate timely referral and ensure consistent evaluation and management of patients with this complex and often underestimated condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.