ArticleCell reports methods2026
Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Deconvolved tumor adipocyte proportions and high grade serous ovarian carcinoma survival.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cells are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, not cytoplasmic, transcripts, its direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. We benchmarked integration strategies across four tissues, comparing principal component (PC)-based latent shifts, conditional and non-conditional scVI (single cell variational inference), and cross-modality differentially expressed gene (DEG) filtering. All approaches improved over raw snRNA-seq, but pruning cross-modality DEGs produced the largest gains, often matching or exceeding scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. These results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as a reference when available, and we recommend appending snRNA-seq only after removing cross-modality DEGs; when DEG information is limited, conditional scVI is a practical alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.