Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41895050›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026

The functional foetal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leonie Loehn, Kirsty Dunn, Michelle To, Vincent M Reid

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonie LoehnThe University of Waikato, School of Psychology and Social Sciences, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Electronic address: ll472@students.waikato.ac.nz.
Kirsty DunnLancaster University, Department of Psychology, Tower Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4XX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.dunn@lancaster.ac.uk.
Michelle ToLancaster University, Department of Psychology, Tower Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4XX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.to@lancaster.ac.uk.
Vincent M ReidThe University of Waikato, School of Psychology and Social Sciences, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Electronic address: vincent.reid@waikato.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work examines functional magnetic resonance imaging and foetal magnetoencephalography studies that measure foetal auditory and visual evoked responses during the third trimester of gestation. A prior study (Dunn et al., 2015) found inconsistent results in healthy human samples due to substantial methodological variability. The updated review also includes studies where participants are at risk of, or are already showing, atypical development. This gives a broader understanding of how and when sensory abilities develop and in which way their development is influenced by foetal and maternal risk factors. 46 studies were included from initial 528 reports. They demonstrate that auditory stimuli activate primarily temporal areas whereas visual stimuli activate only frontal regions. They also show that latencies and amplitudes of foetal evoked responses are comparable between both modalities, but are negatively affected by atypical development. Several stimulus and paradigm characteristics further moderate latency and amplitude values modality specific. Due to insufficient data regarding the gestational age, it remains inconclusive how age affects latencies and amplitudes. Older foetuses show, however, increased response rates and decreased latencies compared to younger foetuses, independent of modality. Key recommendations relate to improving data quality and comparability between studies. This will enable the development of clinical assessment tools in the future.

Indexed as

BrainFetusFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyPregnancyAuditory perceptionEvoked responsesFoetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG)FoetusFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Visual perception

Identifiers

PMID41895050
PMCPMC13053791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.