ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Systematic literature review on biopsychosocial factors in the surgical waiting list.
Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prioritizing patients on elective surgical waiting lists is one of the strategies to reduce waiting times for care, improve Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and optimize clinical resources. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, including biopsychosocial factors in the Clinical Priority Assessment Criteria (CPAC) is critical for an equitable and efficient allocation of surgical treatments. Long waiting lists, decreased Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL), lack of capacity of health care facilities, and lack of policies to improve these problems negatively affect the population worldwide. This article presents a systematic literature review to identify biopsychosocial factors that can be used for prioritizing patients on surgical waiting lists. 71 articles were studied, finding that the most frequently mentioned biopsychosocial factors are pain and/or discomfort, followed by patient age, disease severity, comorbidities, expected complications after the procedure, ability to work and/or study, efficacy of the procedure and/or expected improvement, time on the waiting list, ability to participate in family/social activities, impact on the disease if surgery is delayed, need for a caregiver, effect on the procedure if surgery is delayed, composition and size of the surgical team, being a caregiver, length of hospital stay, urgency of the procedure, among others. These findings reinforce the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the patient and the environment to improve clinical outcomes and equity in access to surgical interventions by integrating the patient and physician perspectives in pursuit of better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.