SynthesisNursing ethics2026
Patients' experiences of humanising care in Scandinavian intensive care units - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Nursing ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using Scandinavian literature reporting patient experiences of intensive care as a case, the aim of this qualitative systematic review was to explore if humanising was addressed in the descriptions of patient experiences and, if so, what words and theoretical perspectives were used to underpin the results. A comprehensive search of qualitative studies published between 1 January 2016 and 12 December 2024 was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Twenty-nine studies reporting patient ICU experiences were included and analysed using thematic synthesis following Thomas and Harden. The review adhered to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research checklist. The terms humanisation and de-humanisation were not explicitly used, but the studies engaged with these concepts by corroborating the three themes that defined humanising ICU in this study: (1) feeling recognised as a human being when experiencing connectedness with healthcare professionals, (2) feeling connected with themselves and the situation when experiencing safety and well-being, and (3) feeling connected with significant persons and life outside the ICU. In addition, our analysis identified a further theme: (4) experiencing capacity to influence the situation when able to express themselves. Humanising intensive care involves ethical and caring engagement with the patient, helping them feel connected, experience well-being, and influence their situation. Although Scandinavian literature has not directly studied humanisation, it has focused on understanding patients' experiences and addressing the ontology of critical illness. As such, humanising ICU aligns well with Scandinavian nursing traditions.Implications for clinical practiceICU staff should actively listen to patients and encourage them to express needs and preferences, create a safe and calm environment that supports well-being, and maintain communication with patients and families to promote a humanising approach to intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.