ReviewBlood advances2026
Management of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.
Review in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractFrontline therapy for systemic amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis has evolved significantly with the approval of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone, which has significantly improved rates of both hematologic and organ responses. Despite these advances, many patients eventually relapse, and there remains no established standard salvage regimen or optimal timing. In this review, we examine optimal timing of salvage regimens and currently available therapeutic options after daratumumab failure, including next-generation proteosome inhibitors or immunomodulatory drugs, autologous stem cell transplant, BCL-2 inhibitors, and emerging immunotherapeutic agents such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.