Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894687›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Early PET response predicts the risk of relapse after 2L axi-cel in large B-cell lymphoma.

Andrea Kuhnl, Amy A Kirkwood, Michael Northend, Rajesh Alajangi, Ben Uttenthal, Jane Norman, Hwai Hiew, Frances Seymour, Bernard D Maybury, Wendy Osborne and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Andrea KuhnlDepartment of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Amy A KirkwoodCR UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael NorthendDepartment of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Rajesh AlajangiDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ben UttenthalDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jane NormanManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hwai HiewDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Frances SeymourLeeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-7195
Bernard D MayburyDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-8900
Wendy OsborneDepartment of Haematology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Francesca SillitoDepartment of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed AbdulgawadDepartment of Haematology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5551-7416
Ceri JonesDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Alison DelaneySheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-4667-7513
William TownsendDepartment of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-2448
Aikaterini PanopoulouDepartment of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-3379
John G GribbenBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8505-7430
Edward BataillardImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Amrith MathewDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-6675
Nicolas Martinez-CalleDepartment of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5184-9464
Lavanya GajendranDepartment of Haematology, St George's University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew J DaviesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-6938
Nikesh ChavdaDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emil KumarDepartment of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-7580-4482
Robin SandersonDepartment of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4915-2833
Sachin KamatDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
George PetridesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Claire RoddieDepartment of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4901-5858
Tobias MenneDepartment of Haematology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Sridhar ChagantiDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPatients with large B-cell lymphoma who progress after second-line (2L) chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy have an increasing number of post-CAR T treatment options available and should be considered for timely intervention if at high risk of CAR T failure. In this national cohort of 302 patients receiving 2L axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), we assessed the use of early fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) response to guide post-CAR T management. A total of 245 patients with treatment response at 1 month were grouped according to depth of response by Deauville score (DS): complete metabolic response or focal residual activity in the bridging radiotherapy field (DS1-3/DS4RT), partial response (PR) DS4, and PR DS5. DS response categories were significantly associated with risk of progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patients with DS4 and DS5 response had a 50% and 73% risk of progression by month 6, respectively, compared with 25% for DS1-3/DS4RT (DS4: hazard ratio [HR], 3.07 [95% CI: 1.85-5.07] and DS5: HR, 5.20 [95% CI: 2.95-9.16]; P< .0001), which was independently significant in multivariable analyses. In a risk model using DS categories and preinfusion lactate dehydrogenase levels ≥2 upper limit of normal, we identified a high-risk group with significant risk of early failure (HR, 5.21 [95% CI: 3.27-8.29]; P< .001). Our results demonstrate the prognostic value of early PET response in patients treated with 2L axi-cel, independent of preinfusion risk factors. Responding high-risk patients had ≥70% risk of progression by month 6 and should be strongly considered for early post-CAR T therapies.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePositron-Emission TomographyAgedBiological ProductsFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment Outcomeaxicabtagene ciloleucelBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID41894687
PMCPMC13234472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.