ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2026
Dual Targeting of Net Formation and Coagulation Improves Survival and Organ Protection in Experimental Sepsis.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSepsis is a life-threatening critical illness characterized by dysregulated host responses, in which excessive neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and sepsis-associated coagulopathy play central roles in organ dysfunction and mortality. Targeting a single pathological pathway has shown limited clinical benefit. Cl-amidine, a peptidylarginine deiminase 4 inhibitor, suppresses NET formation, whereas heparin is widely used in critically ill patients to modulate coagulation and neutralize histone-mediated cytotoxicity. Whether simultaneous targeting of NET-driven inflammation and coagulation dysregulation provides enhanced protection in sepsis remains unclear.
methodsSepsis was induced in C57BL/6J mice using the cecal ligation and puncture model. Mice received postinsult treatment with Cl-amidine (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and/or heparin (1,000 U/kg, intravenously). Seven-day survival was assessed. Circulating NET-related markers (citrullinated histone H3 and myeloperoxidase), inflammatory cytokines, coagulation parameters, and histopathological injury of the lung, liver, and kidney were evaluated.
resultsCombined treatment with Cl-amidine and heparin significantly improved 7-day survival compared with untreated septic mice, whereas Cl-amidine monotherapy did not confer a survival benefit despite significantly reducing NET markers. Cl-amidine significantly reduced NET formation, whereas heparin alone did not show a statistically significant effect on NET markers. Combined treatment further enhanced the reduction of myeloperoxidase levels. Histopathological analysis demonstrated that pulmonary, hepatic, and renal injury were most markedly attenuated in the combination group compared with either monotherapy. Although inflammatory and coagulation parameters were generally improved following treatment, the effects of the combined regimen were comparable to those of the more effective monotherapy for several markers, and no statistically confirmed pharmacological synergy was observed.
conclusionsCombined administration of Cl-amidine and heparin provides a meaningful survival benefit and attenuates multiorgan injury in experimental sepsis. Although no statistically confirmed pharmacological synergy was observed across all parameters, the combined intervention exerted additive protective effects beyond single-agent treatment. Importantly, the additional histological protection could not be explained by further suppression of systemic cytokines or by changes in global coagulation parameters, and the underlying mechanisms therefore remain incompletely defined. Further preclinical studies addressing bleeding risk, optimal dosing strategies, and mechanistic pathways are warranted before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.