ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Accounting for Intra- and Intergenomic Sequence Variation in Reference Barcodes Improves eDNA Metabarcoding Biodiversity Assessment.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can rapidly characterise biodiversity, yet its accuracy and effectiveness are limited by incomplete DNA barcode reference databases. We evaluated how comprehensive reference databases that include sequence variation within genomes (intragenomic) and across individuals and species (intergenomic) improve eDNA-based biodiversity assessments. We collected coral tissue and water samples at deep sites offshore Puerto Rico for reference barcoding and eDNA metabarcoding. Genome skimming coral specimens yielded 28S barcodes for 314 of 346 samples (90.8%) and revealed divergent intragenomic 28S lineages in multiple octocoral families. Incorporating local reference barcodes substantially changed ASV taxonomic classifications: 22 ASVs (8.9%) gained genus-level resolution, 19 ASVs (7.7%) were reassigned to different genera, and 14 ASVs (5.7%) lost incorrect genus-level classifications. Thus, incomplete reference databases produce not only unclassified ASVs but also false positive detections and ecologically meaningful misclassifications. When intragenomic 28S lineages were excluded from the reference database, 18 ASVs (7.4%) could not be classified to family or genus, demonstrating that unrecognised intragenomic variation can be mistaken for unsampled taxa. Integrating reference genome skimming and eDNA metabarcoding expanded known coral family richness by 36% at depths shallower than 1000 m and by 181% at depths greater than 1000 m. eDNA also detected two coral families previously unknown off Puerto Rico and nearby islands, underscoring its potential for biodiversity discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.