Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894544›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Understanding Graduate Students' Perspectives on Food Apps to Inform User-Centered Design: Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Survey Study.

Mehrnoush Mokhtarnejad, Lyda Fontes McCartin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehrnoush MokhtarnejadSchool of Information Science, University of South Carolina, 1501 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States, 1 803-777-0169.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-5891
Lyda Fontes McCartinSchool of Information Science, University of South Carolina, 1501 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States, 1 803-777-0169.ORCID 0000-0002-7411-6917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile food apps have the potential to promote healthier eating behaviors and more sustainable food practices. Graduate students often struggle to maintain healthy dietary habits due to lifestyle transitions, academic stress, limited time, and constrained budgets, which can lead to poor meal planning, irregular eating patterns, and increased food waste. Objective: This study aimed to examine graduate students' dietary behaviors, food waste practices, and preferences for mobile food app features, with the intention of informing the design of user-centered tools that promote healthy eating and reduce food waste. Methods: This study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. In the first phase, 63 graduate students at the University of South Carolina completed an online survey between November and December 2024, which captured demographics, cooking habits, dietary preferences, food waste behaviors, and online recipe search behaviors. Findings from the survey shaped the design of interview questions, allowing qualitative inquiry to explain and expand upon the quantitative patterns. Ten purposively selected participants completed semistructured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and using the chi-square test with R software (version 4.3.1), while qualitative data were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results: Survey findings revealed that 54% (34/63) of the participants ate out daily or almost daily; 25.3% (16/63) consumed fast, frozen, or canned food at least 3 to 5 times per week; and only 19% (12/63) cooked daily. Most participants consumed only 1 serving of vegetables (43/63, 68.2%) and fruits (33/63, 52.4%) daily. Nearly 70% (44/63) reported food waste, primarily from leftovers and unused ingredients. A significant association was found between shopping list use and reduced food waste (χ²1=9.66, P=.008; Cramér V=0.39). The interviews contextualized these patterns: the students described time constraints, limited cooking skills, and overbuying as key barriers to healthy eating and waste reduction, while recommending app features such as nutrition tracking, batch meal planning, personalized dietary filters, ingredient-based recipe generators, and grocery list tools with reminders. Participants also emphasized the importance of simple design, multimodal content, and accurate cooking time estimates. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that integrating quantitative and qualitative insights through the capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior (COM-B) framework provides a nuanced understanding of graduate students' dietary practices, food waste behaviors, and app feature preferences. The findings highlight the need for mobile food apps that are not only evidence based but also user centered, offering simple, time-efficient, and customizable tools that simultaneously address capability deficits, opportunity barriers, and motivation maintenance. Such apps have the potential to address barriers unique to graduate students, such as limited time, minimal cooking skills, and organizational challenges, while supporting healthier eating and reducing food waste.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMobile ApplicationsStudentsUser-Centered DesignAdultFemaleFood Loss and WasteHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSouth CarolinaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFood Loss and Wastecapability, opportunity, and motivation-behavior modelCOM-B modelfood appsfood wastegraduate studentshealthy eatingmixed methodsmobile apps

Identifiers

PMID41894544
PMCPMC13026433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.