ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring the use of art interventions in challenging stigmas related to neurological disorders: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStigma remains a major barrier to accessing healthcare for people with neurological disorders. The World Health Organization's Intersectoral Global Action Plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders urges all member countries to have at least one functioning awareness campaign for neurological disorders by 2031. Art has emerged as a valuable tool for social change with previous success in highly stigmatised disorders. This review aims to understand the effectiveness of art-based interventions in reducing stigma related to neurological disorders.
methodsA scoping review was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase); from inception to October 2024. Data relevant to the study's aims were extracted and underwent narrative synthesis to develop key themes and patterns across the included studies.
resultsAfter removing duplicates, 9,992 articles were screened with 24 articles identified for inclusion. Studies were predominantly from high-income settings (63%) and addressed stigma in dementia (38%), epilepsy (42%), and stroke (21%). Included studies targeted young children through to older adults. The most common form of art was videos (38%) which were predominantly short and educational, followed by visual arts (42%) which included short films, adverts, and use of images, and dance and theatre (25%). Art was used to change attitudes and perceptions (71%), raise awareness and enhance knowledge (54%), and influence emotions and behaviour (46%).
conclusionsThis review highlighted that art-based interventions effectively contributed to stigma reduction by addressing misinformation, challenging prejudices, and encouraging supportive actions but data from low resource settings were scarce. Interventions prioritising the direct interactions between a small number of the public and people with lived experience seemed particularly effective, however, the potential for theatre productions and digital media to target a larger audience should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.