ArticlePLOS digital health2026
AVPENet: Pain estimation from audio-visual fusion of non-speech sounds.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zero-shot multimodal pain estimation via synthetic pain simulation and domain-invariant learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain assessment in non-verbal patients, including neonates and unconscious adults, remains a critical challenge in clinical practice. Current pain scales rely heavily on observer interpretation and may lack objectivity, introducing significant inter-rater variability. We propose a novel multimodal deep learning framework that estimates continuous pain intensity by fusing non-speech audio cues with facial expressions. Our approach addresses the critical need for objective pain assessment in vulnerable populations unable to self-report. We developed a cross-modal attention-based fusion network combining spectrogram-derived audio embeddings with facial action unit features. The model was trained and validated on 3,247 audio-visual recordings from 428 subjects, including 215 neonates and 213 adults, across three distinct pain intensity levels. We employed a ResNet-based audio encoder for mel-spectrogram processing and a facial landmark convolutional neural network for expression analysis, integrated through a transformer-based fusion module that learns complementary relationships between modalities. Our model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.89 on a 0-10 pain scale, significantly outperforming audio-only approaches (mean absolute error 1.47, 39% improvement) and visual-only baselines (mean absolute error 1.23, 28% improvement). Cross-age group validation demonstrated robust generalization with mean absolute errors of 0.94 for neonates and 0.91 for adults. The model maintained a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.89 with ground truth annotations and achieved 81.4% accuracy for three-class pain categorization. Audio-visual fusion significantly enhances pain estimation accuracy across diverse age groups and clinical scenarios. This approach offers substantial potential for objective, automated pain monitoring in clinical settings, particularly for vulnerable populations unable to self-report pain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.