ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond Blueprints: Exploring the influence of social science factors on engineers' flood infrastructure design decisions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communities rely on infrastructure for daily activities, and when assets are damaged during a disaster, they face significant costs, both in physical damages as well as quality of life disruptions. Most engineering research focuses on material properties and modeling to understand the outcomes of nature-infrastructure interactions; however, little research explores the human factors driving engineers' design decisions. The objective of this exploratory qualitative work is to examine the role of human decision-making among engineers to better understand influential factors for flood infrastructure design. Open-ended interviews were conducted in 2022 with flood infrastructure engineers in the US who work on levees, dams, and breakwaters to better understand design parameter interactions with personal attitudes about risk and climate. Findings indicate four crucial areas that influence the design process: 1) Stakeholder involvement and influence; 2) Risk perception and tolerance of the engineer (and, specifically, tensions with the norms for risk in the home organization and the profession at large); 3) Personal characteristics of the engineer (such as their attitudes toward disasters based on personal experience), and 4) Key areas of weakness within the profession as a whole. This work provides a foundation to advance initial qualitative findings, and takeaways from this research can forge stronger interdisciplinary collaborations, while the regional focus on the U.S. may necessitate caution in global generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.