Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894529›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Kenyan Neonatal Mortality Risk Predictor: Protocol for a User-Centered Design Evaluation.

Ronald Danny Nyatuka, Paul Macharia, Kakhata Esther, Faith Siva, Betsy Muriithi, Md Shafiqur Rahman Jabin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ronald Danny NyatukaSchool of Computing and Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-7695
Paul MachariaSchool of Computing and Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-8873
Kakhata EstherSchool of Computing and Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-6193
Faith SivaSchool of Computing and Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-0608-0892
Betsy MuriithiSchool of Computing and Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-1393-2045
Md Shafiqur Rahman JabinDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, Växjö, 39231, Sweden, 46 7915673612.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-8716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where health systems often lack effective triage mechanisms to identify and prioritize high-risk neonates. Existing clinical tools frequently fail to support timely decision-making during the critical early postnatal period. A previous machine learning (ML)-based neonatal risk prediction model developed using multicountry LMIC datasets demonstrated high predictive accuracy for neonatal mortality in the Indian context, achieving an area under the curve above 0.80. The model incorporates 11 neonatal parameters assessed from delivery through day 2 of life, with birth weight identified as the strongest predictor. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the contextual feasibility, applicability, and usability of the neonatal risk predictor variables embedded in the ML model in Kenyan health care facilities to inform potential adoption aligned with national health priorities and global targets, including Sustainable Development Goal 3.2. Methods: A mixed methods feasibility study will be conducted through the real-world preimplementation of a neonatal risk assessment tool in 3 Kenyan health facilities that provide neonatal services. Qualitative and quantitative approaches will be combined to strengthen methodological rigor and enhance the credibility of the findings. The study will be implemented in 3 sequential phases. Phase 1 will involve key informant interviews to capture contextual insights on existing workflows, stakeholder perceptions, and implementation considerations. Phase 2 will comprise a 4-month intervention period during which a paper-based neonatal risk tool will be integrated into routine clinical workflows to assess feasibility, applicability, and usability. Phase 3 will involve postintervention surveys conducted longitudinally at 2 time points to evaluate outcomes, user experience, and implementation barriers. Results: The neonatal risk predictors are expected to demonstrate strong contextual feasibility, allowing for integration into existing triage systems with minimal workflow disruption. Their applicability is expected to enable early identification of high-risk neonates within the first 48 hours of life, thereby enabling timely clinical decision-making. Usability assessments are expected to indicate positive user experience, acceptability, and perceived usefulness among health care workers. Six participants (frontline neonatal health workers) had been recruited by the time of initial submission of the manuscript (August 2025). Data analysis is ongoing and is expected to be concluded in March 2026. Publication of study findings is expected by June 2026. Conclusions: The study is expected to generate actionable evidence to support the translation of ML-based neonatal risk prediction into routine clinical practice in LMIC settings, thereby reducing neonatal mortality and advancing progress toward Sustainable Development Goal target 3.2.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKenyaMachine LearningPredictive Learning ModelsResearch DesignResource-Limited SettingsRisk Assessmentfeasibilitylow- and middle-income countriesmachine learningneonatal mortalitypredictive accuracy

Identifiers

PMID41894529
PMCPMC13026422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.