ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Healthcare workers' beliefs, practices and experiences regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting governance from preparedness and response plans in Faranah, Guinea.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the implementation of people-centered components within outbreak preparedness and response plans and their resulting governance. Information on this topic still remains scarce, particularly in settings such as Guinea in West Africa. In the context of COVID-19, we conducted 21 qualitative interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) from the Faranah Regional Hospital in Guinea to explore pandemic preparedness and response adherence. We also analyzed corresponding senses of vulnerability and risk, information sources, perceived information reliability, associated rumors and previous outbreak experiences. To achieve a broader analysis, we employed the "therapeutic landscape" concept, which conceives health provision as a process constructed through practices, beliefs and experiences. A recurring theme across the interviews was the abundance of information, which caused confusion mainly due to rumors and a lack of trust in the country's health system. Initial fear gradually diminished due to the disease's low mortality rate in the country. HCWs described preparedness enforcement in the city of Faranah that started strongly but gradually relaxed over time. This waning of enforcement marked a difference between the city and the hospital. HCWs appraised the first positive case declaration in the city to be the most significant moment, followed by a strong community reaction hindering the pandemic governance. We conclude that preparedness and response plans must better situate their interventions socially and devote more structural efforts to incorporating the social landscapes of diseases and outbreaks. Incorporating these social landscapes facilitates an understanding of the operational barriers to people-centered approaches. It also serves as an indicator for strengthening infodemic detection and management. Responses should therefore consider 1) hospitals applying different pandemic understandings that transcend biomedical and scientific orders, and 2) HCWs as portraying shifting pre-existing identities leading to marked in-/out-group distinctions, which directly influence healthcare, risk perception, and information and rumor management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.