Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894431›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2026

Transplantation of

Jitendra Singh, Amit Kumar Sahu, Umesh Varshney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jitendra SinghDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Amit Kumar SahuDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Umesh VarshneyDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial translation machinery exhibits similarities with the bacterial translation apparatus. Of the three bacterial translation initiation factors (IF1, IF2 and IF3), two (IF2 and IF3) have homologues in mitochondria (mtIF2 and mtIF3). A high conservation of decoding nucleotides in the ribosomal A-site suggests relevance of IF1-like proteins in mitochondria. The mitochondrial translation machineries have evolved with different solutions for the IF1 function. However, in

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsPeptide Initiation FactorsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansProtein BiosynthesisMitochondrial ProteinsPeptide Initiation FactorsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsIF1mitochondrial IF2Rmd9ptranslation initiation factors

Identifiers

PMID41894431
PMCPMC13030852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.