Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Underlying structure and measurement invariance by sex of the state trait anxiety inventory: A psychometric analysis in Ecuador.

Jose A Rodas, Daniel Oleas, Guido Mascialino, José Alejandro Valdevila Figueira, Alberto Rodríguez-Lorenzana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose A RodasEscuela de Psicología, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-0238
Daniel OleasDepartment of Research, Universidad Ecotec, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-814X
Guido MascialinoEscuela de Psicología y Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-6546
José Alejandro Valdevila FigueiraEscuela de Psicología, Universidad Ecotec, Samborondón, Ecuador.
Alberto Rodríguez-LorenzanaDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety is currently one of the most prevalent and investigated psychological symptoms requiring precise and reliable instruments for its assessment. The current study evaluates the psychometric properties of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in an Ecuadorian sample, focusing on the factor structure and potential methodological artefacts, especially those introduced by reverse-scored items. Employing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), along with structural equation modelling (SEM), the research examines the presence of two distinct factors: genuine anxiety and a secondary factor related to reversed items. Findings indicate that the expected two-factor model fits the data more accurately than a unidimensional model. Notably, cross-loadings suggest the second factor may represent a substantive positive, anxiety-free state rather than solely a methodological effect. Additionally, multigroup CFA confirmed strict measurement invariance across sex, supporting the scale's utility for group comparisons. These results suggest that the STAI's total score represents a composite of anxiety and well-being. While the STAI remains a robust tool for evaluating anxiety in clinical contexts, researchers seeking pure measures of anxiety symptomatology should consider analysing the subscales separately.

Indexed as

AnxietyPsychometricsAdolescentAdultEcuadorFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41894381
PMCPMC13028510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.