Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894377›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Reputation and trust in health insurance: A scoping review of key drivers and outcomes.

Gaël Saillen, Nicola Diviani, Sara Rubinelli

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gaël SaillenFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0846-8183
Nicola DivianiFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1386-9915
Sara RubinelliFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-8914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReputation is a critical factor in the health insurance industry, impacting business performance and public health outcomes. However, despite its acknowledged importance, the reputation of health insurers has received limited attention in both academic research and industry practice. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of health insurers' reputation could help insurers strategically manage their public image while providing policymakers with valuable insights to develop policies that improve health outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to identify the factors shaping the reputation of health insurers and to assess the broader impacts of reputation within the industry and the health care system.

designA scoping review was conducted to map the existing literature on the reputation of health insurers. Using the PRISMA-ScR framework, it identified key determinants and outcomes of health insurer reputation, clarified concepts of reputation and trust, and highlighted gaps in the current body of literature.

resultsA total of 3385 records were identified, of which 397 were fully screened for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 45 studies. The majority of the included studies conducted surveys (n = 40), while the minority employed qualitative interviews (n = 6) and focus group discussions (n = 7). The total number of participants involved in the included studies is 31'344. The analysis identified 23 descriptives themes, which were organised into two main analytical categories: determinants and outcomes. The determinants included 17 descriptive themes which have been further classified into three groups based on whether they pertain to policyholders, insurers or providers. The outcomes consist of six key descriptive themes.

conclusionThis review provides a thorough analysis of research that have investigated different aspects of health insurance reputation and identify significant gaps in the literature. It maps key determinants of reputation - such as corporate culture, product structure, and service quality - that insurers can directly influence. Additionally, factors like the quality of healthcare providers and targeted communication efforts may also be linked to reputation. The analysis underscores the importance of reputation for core business activities (e.g., client acquisition and retention) and its role in preventive healthcare. Notably, there is a lack of research on the regulatory implications of insurers' reputation, suggesting a need for further studies to enhance preventive strategies and integrate insurers into a broader public health framework.

Indexed as

Insurance CarriersInsurance, HealthTrustHumans

Identifiers

PMID41894377
PMCPMC13028422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.