ArticleMedicine2026
Construction of orthopedic specialty nursing quality standards based on sensitive indicators.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing Clinical Leadership in Orthopedic Nursing: A Qualitative Study to Identify the Components of a Complex Intervention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to systematically construct a scientific, structured, and clinically applicable system of sensitive quality indicators for orthopedic specialty nursing to provide standardized and quantifiable tools for precise management, evaluation, and continuous improvement of orthopedic nursing quality. A multi-method design integrating evidence-based research, empirical analysis, and expert consensus was adopted. First, based on the structure-process-outcome theoretical model, a systematic evidence synthesis was conducted on domestic and international orthopedic nursing quality literature from the past fifteen years to develop an initial indicator pool. Subsequently, multicenter on-site clinical observations were conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals, and semi-structured interviews were performed with 32 key stakeholders, including physicians, nurses, rehabilitation therapists, and patients, to supplement perspectives from clinical practice and patient experience. On this basis, 2 rounds of rigorous Delphi expert consultation (25 experts) were carried out for indicator screening and revision, followed by determination of the relative weights of each indicator level using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Through systematic evidence synthesis, an initial pool of 138 indicators was established, covering the 3 domains of structure, process, and outcome. After 2 rounds of Delphi consultation (expert response rates of 92% and 100%, respectively), expert opinion demonstrated significant coordination (second-round Kendall W = 0.412, P <.001). The final orthopedic specialty nursing quality evaluation framework consisted of 12 primary dimensions and 68 secondary indicators. AHP weight analysis further revealed the relative importance of each dimension, among which "functional rehabilitation management" (14.7%), "Complication Outcomes" (13.9%), and "Nurse Competency Assurance" (12.5%) were identified as the 3 core dimensions with the highest weights. This study successfully developed a sensitive orthopedic specialty nursing quality indicator system grounded in the structure-process-outcome model, with both scientific rigor and clinical applicability. The system features comprehensive indicators, clear logic, and reasonable weighting, providing essential tools for standardized measurement and quantitative evaluation of orthopedic nursing quality, as well as important references for precise interventions and continuous improvement in clinical nursing quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.