ArticleGenetics2026
Crossover formation and coordinated assembly of synaptonemal complex relies on a direct interaction between Zip1 and Zip3.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structure and function of the synaptonemal complex.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several proteins collaborate to promote the crossover recombination events critical for accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis. How these "ZMM" factors (Zip2, Zip3, Zip4, Spo16, Mer3, and MutSγ) collaboratively function remains incompletely understood. We previously reported that Zip3's abundance and activity rely on the synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1, and specifically on Zip1's N-terminal residues associated with crossovers and coupling SC assembly to the crossover pathway. Here, we demonstrate that Zip3 co-immunoprecipitates Zip1 from meiotic cells independent of recombination initiation and other ZMMs and that Zip3's interaction with Zip1 relies on Zip1's N-terminal residues. Co-expression and pull-down experiments in bacterial cells demonstrate that Zip1 and Zip3 interact directly. Experiments to identify Zip3 regions required for the Zip1 interaction unexpectedly revealed an incorrectly annotated translational start; we also determined that Zip3's N-terminal structured region is necessary and sufficient for the interaction, and a predicted coil downstream of Zip3's RING domain is essential for specific activities attributed to Zip1's N-terminal tip such as proximity labeling of Zip3 by Zip2 and the coupling of crossover recombination to SC assembly. Finally, we discovered that interaction with Zip1 protects Zip3 not only from proteasome-mediated degradation but also from posttranslational modification when another ZMM is absent. We propose that direct interaction with Zip1's N terminus orients Zip3 within a nascent ZMM ensemble in a manner that facilitates crossover formation and the coupling of crossover intermediates to SC assembly and, furthermore, ensures Zip3 remains both abundant and unmodified until all requisite ZMMs have joined the group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.