ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Impact of methane-mitigating concentrate feed on milk production, composition, and udder health in Holstein cows.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enteric methane emissions from dairy cattle contribute substantially to agricultural greenhouse gas output. Although feed-based mitigation strategies have shown promise in controlled research environments, their effects under commercial farm conditions remain insufficiently studied. This field-based study evaluated the associations between methane-mitigating concentrate (MM) feed and milk yield, milk composition, and udder health indicators in Holstein cows across three commercial farms in Jeju, South Korea. A total of 400 lactating cows were monitored over 47 months (January 2021–November 2024) as the farms transitioned from conventional concentrate feed to MM feed. Mixed models and stepwise regression analyses were used to assess the independent effects of MM feeding while accounting for farm, parity, and seasonal variation. MM feeding did not significantly affect overall milk yield or milk fat content. However, MM feeding was associated with lower milk protein, solid non-fat (SNF), and milk urea nitrogen (MUN) concentrations, along with a modest increase in somatic cell count (SCC). These associations varied among farms and parities, indicating that the effects of MM feed are influenced by management and physiological factors rather than a single dietary component. Stepwise regression retained MM feeding as a significant explanatory variable for SNF, MUN, and SCC, but not for milk yield or fat content. These findings indicate that MM feed can be implemented under commercial farm conditions without compromising milk yield, while influencing nitrogen-related milk traits and udder health indicators. Further studies incorporating direct methane measurements and mechanistic evaluation of rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization are needed to determine the environmental implications of MM feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.