Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894097›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association2026

Geospatial analysis and prevalence estimation of household drinking water treatment in sub-Saharan African countries: insights from recent demographic and health surveys.

Gelila Yitageasu, Eyob Akalewold Alemu, Alemayehu Kasu Gebrehana, Angwach Abrham Asnake, Lidetu Demoze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gelila YitageasuDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. gelilayitageasu1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7398-4956
Eyob Akalewold AlemuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Alemayehu Kasu GebrehanaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Salale University, Fitche, Ethiopia.
Angwach Abrham AsnakeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Lidetu DemozeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8906-0689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn sub-Saharan countries, where a large number of populations depend on unsafe water, household water treatment is the recommended means to improve and maintain the safety and quality of water. Boiling, adding bleach, filtration, solar disinfection, straining through cloth, and settling are among well-known treatment methods. However, the practice in the region is very low. The current study is intended to assess the spatial analysis and scope estimation of households’ water treatment methods in sub-Saharan African countries.

methodsThe Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data were collected from 2012 to 2024 in 34 sub-Saharan countries, encompassing 500,845 households and 20,492 clusters. Global spatial autocorrelation was performed to analyze whether the pattern of household water treatment is clustered, dispersed, or random across the study areas. Once a positive global autocorrelation was confirmed, a local spatial autocorrelation analysis (Getis-Ord Gi* statistics) was employed to detect local clusters. ArcGIS version 10.7 was used to map the clusters, and Kulldorff SaTScan version 10.0.2 software, using the Bernoulli model, was used for spatial scan statistical tests. The geo-statistical ordinary Kriging spatial interpolation technique was used to predict unsampled areas based on sampled clusters.

resultThe overall prevalence of household water treatment across sub-Saharan Africa between 2012 and 2024 was 20% (95% CI: 19.7%–20.0%). Reported treatment methods included boiling (9.04%), bleaching (6.98%), filtration (0.90%), solar disinfection (0.07%), straining through cloth (2.54%), settling (1.59%), and other methods (0.62%). Regarding treatment adequacy, 16.98% of households used adequate methods, 4.75% used inadequate methods, and 0.99% used both. Spatial analysis showed clear clustering of household water treatment practices, with hotspots identified in Madagascar, Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi, Malawi, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Mali, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. SaTScan cluster analysis identified 78 significant windows across the region.

conclusionThe low prevalence of household water treatment across sub-Saharan Africa underscores a substantial barrier to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6.1. To address this, efforts should focus on improving access to affordable and context-appropriate household water treatment technologies, implementing community-level health education and behavior change programs to promote correct water treatment practices, and targeting hotspot regions identified in the spatial analysis with coordinated interventions from governments, NGOs, and partners. These strategies are essential to reduce waterborne diseases and accelerate progress toward universal access to safe drinking water.

Indexed as

Drinking waterHouseholdSpatialSub-Saharan AfricaWater treatment

Identifiers

PMID41894097
PMCPMC13031573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.