SynthesisHealth & justice2026
Mental health and routine police work: a systematic scoping review.
Synthesis in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing attention to the amount of contact between police and those experiencing mental health problems. This includes the amount of time and resource spent by police in attending to calls related to mental health, as well as what the role of the police should be in relation to other agencies, including mental health and social care services. The aim of the scoping review was to identify what research has been conducted about police response to mental health in terms of decision making, responses, as well as skills and interventions.
methodsA scoping review using the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was conducted. Papers were included if they reported research on routine police work when responding to people with mental health problems or experiencing mental distress. Seven databases were searched and a two-stage searching procedure was followed. Screening and data extraction was completed by two researchers working independently.
resultsA total of 14,608 texts were found; 7,164 were removed as duplicates and 7,281 were removed after screening titles and abstracts. After full text screening a further 100 were excluded, leaving 63 papers for data extraction. About half of the papers included police only as participants (n = 31) and only 10 papers were from the perspective of people with lived experience. Three themes emerged from the thematic analysis: “policing decisions and actions”; “coordinating with other providers” and “lived experience”.
conclusionsPolice have skills that have been developed experientially rather than through formal training. There is often a lack of shared understanding between police and other agencies leading to uncertainty about how to best help the person with mental health concerns. Police can and do make a positive contribution to the multi-agency response to people with mental health problems, though should not necessarily be the first (or only) response to mental health calls. Most of the research to date has focused on the police role in mental health crisis. Further research is needed on understanding the police role in encountering mental health problems in routine work (as victims, witnesses or perpetrators). REGISTRATION: The protocol was published on Open Science Framework (tcs45).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.