ArticlePituitary2026
Temozolomide in aggressive and metastatic pituitary tumors: a Brazilian multicenter real-world cohort study.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) in aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors in a Latin American setting, and to address whether TMZ achieves meaningful radiological and biochemical disease control with acceptable toxicity.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study across Brazilian reference centers including patients with aggressive/metastatic pituitary adenomas treated with TMZ and followed for ≥ 6 months. The radiological response was assessed via RECIST 1.1. For functioning pituitary adenomas, biochemical response was assessed using prespecified hormonal criteria. Adverse events were collected from medical records.
resultsThirty patients were included (mean age 29.5 years; 53% female). All the tumors were macroadenomas, and 56% were giant (> 4 cm). Twenty-one pituitary adenomas were functioning and four were metastatic. Ki-67 was > 3% in 73% of the patients. The mean time from diagnosis to TMZ initiation was 102 months. The radiological disease control rate (partial response or stable disease) was 93.3%. Among functioning tumors, the biochemical disease control rate was 81.2%, with an objective biochemical response rate (complete + partial response) of 68.8%. Adverse events, most commonly nausea and myelotoxicity, occurred in 66% of patients.
conclusionIn this multicenter Brazilian real-world cohort, TMZ provided high radiological and biochemical disease control with an acceptable safety profile, suggesting that TMZ is the preferred first-line systemic chemotherapy for aggressive/metastatic pituitary adenomas after the failure of standard therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.