Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894064›Full record

ReviewNeuroinformatics2026

The Deep Learning Revolution in Neuroimaging: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024).

Jyotismita Chaki, Gopikrishna Deshpande

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jyotismita ChakiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India. jyotismita@vit.ac.in.
Gopikrishna DeshpandeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, AU MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. gzd0005@auburn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the fast-growing area of deep learning in neuroimaging. Using data from the Scopus database, we analyzed 12564 peer-reviewed publications originating from 102 countries, published in 2259 sources over the period from 2014 to 2024. The field demonstrated a compound average annual growth rate of 51.7%. We found that China emerged as the most productive contributor, accounting for 22.9% of the total publications and 18% of total citations. The Chinese Academy of Sciences was identified as the most productive research institution with 149 publications and 1557 citations, while Lecture Notes in Computer Science was noted as the most highly cited source in this domain. High usage of deep learning, brain, and magnetic resonance imaging identified the most prominent research themes. Also, our analysis noted strong research emphasis on the application of various deep learning architectures for the diagnosis and study of important neurological disorders like Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and Mild Cognitive Impairment. The article would be useful in understanding the current state-of-the-art deep learning for neuroimaging by identifying key research trends, influential institutions, and prominent research themes. In this way, it will contribute to helping future researchers go further in this fast-growing field.

Indexed as

BibliometricsDeep LearningNeuroimagingBrainDatabases, FactualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBibliometric AnalysisDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Neuroimaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.